60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
60 points (96.9% liked)
Slop.
880 readers
558 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I need to contest your idea regarding there being different porn preferences based on assigned gender at birth.
Beyond the fact that I don't know what the mechanism would be for that, given ones assigned sex/gender is something social, not biological, I can tell you from experience that porn with plot and written erotica is EXTREMELY popular in Transfem spaces. Like, overwhelmingly, in addition to a general preference for drawn/animated pornography instead of live action stuff.
Yeah, that's been my experience too actually. I do write for a lot of trans people personally (probably at least half of my stuff LOL) and that very much aligns with my experiences, I was just using imprecise language a bit there. I get specifically commissioned to write stuff for individuals, and from that perspective I feel like I have definitely noticed a gap between the tastes of specifically cis men and non-cis men who I have worked for, to a degree where, while I can't imagine there's one single neat explanation behind it, I feel like it can't just be down to culture. I probably chose to phrase it that way specifically because the AFAB people I know just mention that it takes a lot longer to, you know, pleasure themselves, and I figure the process taking longer and being more finnicky and difficult is probably one of several contributors to these different consumption patterns. Also, wasn't really speaking about live action vs. animation at all in that regard, I think that's kind of an orthogonal discussion. Plenty of drawn and animated stuff still fits into that "immediate, visual-focused gratification" category just as neatly as filmed pornography.
Yeah i unfortunately have to elaborate on this because it has become such a common mistake that i see being made all the time.
Please do not ever use AFAB and AMAB to refer to people. Nobody is "an AMAB person", let's just spell it out to see what happens: "an assigned male at birth person" obviously is not a correct English term, whereas "a person who was assigned male at birth" is. But saying "an AMAB person" or "AFAB only housing" (another transphobia classic) does not produce a grammatically correct phrase when you spell out the acronym.
That is because you, like almost everybody else, are misappropriating the term. Intersex people came up with these terms to specifically refer to a process, not a person: the process of using anatomy-based heuristics to sex people after birth. That's the one thing AMAB and AFAB were designed to reference, and it's the only thing it does right reliably, which means it has extremely limited uses.
Out of all gender-related terms, AMAB and AFAB are probably the least versatille and most specific. In this case, it's better to just say "women", as you have noticed by yourself at this point. It's ok to just subsume trans women under women in almost any case, as we are, in fact, women and want to be recognized as such. I can not only live with being lumped in with cis women, in more than 90% of all cases it is precisely what i want. There are obviously exceptions that usually appear either in medical contexts or when we specifically talk about trans experiences, or when it is necessary to also include other gender variant groups.
This isn't true. More precisely, it varies so much from person to person that any generalizations here are useless.
I'm transmasc and it doesn't take me any longer (on average) to cum than it takes my partner, who is a cis man. When I was in college talking to my (female) friend about her and her boyfriend's sex life, her continual complaint was that it took him forever to cum. She could cum quick and easy, but he took forever.
So I don't have any data here (if anyone does, please share!), but every bit of anecdotal evidence from my life is that it's a myth that people with dicks cum quicker than people with pussies. It varies hugely from person to person.
So any difference in porn habits between trans and cis men seems, to me, like it would stem from the way we are treated by society than anything to do with anatomy.