I used to think it funny how Game Theory research has to go through a negative sum medium to become relevant, but now imagine how many papers don’t even get funded because Game Theory has terminology that directly collides with their keywords. I asked Kagi assistant and it gave me a list with an estimate of ~25-30 direct collisions, and ~10-15 fuzzy matches. That’s 35–45 collision terms total.

Disclaimer: not American and not a researcher, just interested in the dynamics happening here