18
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spring_cedar_dust@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/systematic-review-of-systematic-reviews-of-acupuncture/

Always fails upon a closer look.

I love how the 2014 followup showed that 100% of studies out of China are positive. It is just a marketing gimmick for industry.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the links.

[-] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Interesting how you respond to:

I love how the 2014 followup showed that 100% of studies out of China are positive. It is just a marketing gimmick for industry.

By posting a bunch of links to Chinese studies. At least two of which are referenced in the link provided.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

These are peer reviewed studies in western journals. Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of peer review?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This is an interesting theory. I would like to add that acupuncture definitely works for pain temporarily.

While the needles are in the relief is real. My wife, who experiences extreme nausea, also reported it worked for that. They regularly do operations where the patient would not be able to tolerate the pain without anesthesia or acupuncture.

The problem is, once the treatment (the needles are removed) is over the benefit stops. I am interested in the long term benefit. This is where your theory could be put to the test.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
18 points (90.9% liked)

Science

21713 readers
7 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS