90
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space to c/soviet@hexbear.net

Hello everynyan, we're finally going to start reading This Soviet World.

Week 1 we are reading "On Interpreting a World" and Chapter 1: "The plan for Remaking the World."

EPUB, and link to a PDF, of the book can be found on Comrade's Library. If you find problems with the EPUB tell me and I will fix it. Dessalines has made an audio book.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I have some critique of Strong over a few lines which, I think, indicate some level of West-centrism or Orientalism. For example:

Their situation is the more distressing because for most of our Western world the past hundred years has been what John Strachey aptly calls the 'century of the great hope.' [...] Especially America— where [there was] a continent-wide expansion into lands of vast wealth [...] Did not the great lands of America [...] offer the basis for a good standard of life for everyone—an 'American standard'?

This part, at face value, is factual — this is how the US proletariat understood their existence in the country. But I think, during Jim Crow when this book was written, it is unfortunate that Strong does not connect this apparent prosperity (for whites) to chattel slavery and indigenous genocide.

Furthermore, this line rang Orientalist to me:

Even today, do not hundreds of millions of people—those great suppressed races of the East—find life's processes so fundamentally evil that their essential faith is Buddhism in which Nothingness is bliss?

[-] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

There are certainly a few lines that make the book seem like a "product of its time" for lack of a better phrase. I think it really shows her blind spot as a American living at that time, how normalised racial segregation was that it isn't even a topic she broaches, either because she didn't even consider it herself, or because she didn't want to alienate an American audience by speaking about it.

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

Yep, and Marxists have moved on to understand the US Empire as a settler-colony. This is critical to contemporary analysis, and is a weakness so far in Strong's work. Nevertheless, Strong's work is wonderful for elaborating on the nature of soviet society.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
90 points (97.9% liked)

Soviet

446 readers
3 users here now

C/SOVIET

Celebrate the art, music, history, architecture, and glory of the Soviet Union.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS