you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
90 points (97.9% liked)
Soviet
446 readers
3 users here now
C/SOVIET
Celebrate the art, music, history, architecture, and glory of the Soviet Union.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I have some critique of Strong over a few lines which, I think, indicate some level of West-centrism or Orientalism. For example:
This part, at face value, is factual — this is how the US proletariat understood their existence in the country. But I think, during Jim Crow when this book was written, it is unfortunate that Strong does not connect this apparent prosperity (for whites) to chattel slavery and indigenous genocide.
Furthermore, this line rang Orientalist to me:
There are certainly a few lines that make the book seem like a "product of its time" for lack of a better phrase. I think it really shows her blind spot as a American living at that time, how normalised racial segregation was that it isn't even a topic she broaches, either because she didn't even consider it herself, or because she didn't want to alienate an American audience by speaking about it.
Yep, and Marxists have moved on to understand the US Empire as a settler-colony. This is critical to contemporary analysis, and is a weakness so far in Strong's work. Nevertheless, Strong's work is wonderful for elaborating on the nature of soviet society.