70
Music Library Management
(lemmy.zip)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
70 points (98.6% liked)
Selfhosted
60758 readers
181 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I personally use a music tagging/renaming program called Picard. Point it at a relatively unorganized music folder, it tries to identify each track based on the existing metadata or acoustic signature, adds/modifies the track metadata based on the Music Brainz database, and runs a custom renaming script that moves it into place per my preferences.
Its not as automated as I would like, and takes some hand holding, but keeps my collection clean and standardized.
Picard is the way to go if you want to get the highest quality tagging with exact release matching. Most would probably not care too much about this, however when I know my files were ripped from a Japanese release, I want the tags to reflect this. Picard allows me to find the right match before any tags are written. This is especially helpful when you have two or more different versions of the same album, e.g. one CD rip and one vinyl rip, or two CD releases with different set of bonus tracks. My directory structure and tagging rules set in Picard allow me to manage this consistently with no manual workarounds.
I was looking into setting a docker container of Picard, and see what I could do with it. However, I was looking for the most automated solution I could find; and happened to land on Beets.
Though I may still try out Picard as a supplementary option.
Not tried beets (this thread only now made me aware of it), but adding a +1 for Picard
I let it run on a huge chunk of my music and apart from a few tracks it thought should be in compilation albums, worked really well.
After the big sift, I basically just run it on new stuff when I get it...
Sometimes I use Puddletag to fine-tune some data.
I find most new things I get from Bandcamp, etc are in MusicBrainz, so not much editing required... although I have spent some time over the years carefully entering some older, more obscure music.