view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
Author fears to say outright that he believes that Linux Foundation is corrupt organisation that takes bribes. First they don't recieve a lot of money, small IT company I've worked before had ten times that money with <5 projects and 5-10 developers at time. Company I've worked before that had monthly profit bigger than yearly donations that LF recieves. Developer work costs a lot, menagerial work as well. Second, LF is hard to pressure by these supposed agents of corruption. Third, in the event of LF actually being corrupt they can't really force LT to say shit, they don't have 'or else' option.
The Linux Foundation is 'corrupt', but not for the kernel, funding Linus is the green washing.
The Linux Foundation is a lobbying organisation for Big Tech, not Free Software evangelicals.
Do they claim to be Free Software evangelicals and not a neutral org for big tech? IIRC being a neutral lobbying org is their whole thing.
They didn't pick the name "Linux" by mistake, it's a deliberate misdirection for the masses, while having the fallback of "we didn't lie".
Same with the subtle move from Free Software to Open Source. They benifit from peoples misunderstanding.
Yes, and? They aren't the great saviours of Free Software but an entity that serves the purpose to the big tech corps.
None of my points are invalidated.
I wasn't trying to invalidate you, just discuss the Linux Foundation. But I will bet that "small IT company I’ve worked before had ten times that money" has 10 times less power than The Linux Foundation. And I'll point out that the Linux Foundation projects get separate funding and engineering from their members.
Obviously, point was that a $<10 milions a year isn't all that big number for an org size of LF.
That's an interesting perspective. I got the vibe that the writer was suggesting more of a "LF won't bite the hands that feed them, lest the amount of feeding decrease," but perhaps I didn't read between the lines deep enough.