124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 32 points 4 days ago

It's funny to see all the positive (including audience) reactions, after most of the internet discourse over the last few months was about how terrible the movie would be.

I'm lucky enough to have a (digital) IMAX theatre relatively nearby, so I'm planning to watch it there in a few weeks when the screenings are getting less crowded.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

after most of the internet discourse over the last few months was about how terrible the movie would be.

Honestly, 99% of that, from what I could infer without spoiling every detail of the movie, were incels upset some dark skin actress was cast as Helen of Troy

Garbage people are louder than ever

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 15 points 4 days ago

People also made a big thing out of the helmets being period-inaccurate. Which they absolutely are, but it was weird how people seemed to care so much for this movie in particular, whereas no-one seemed to give a shit about all the inaccuracies in the Gladiator movies for example.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

They were very upset about Denzel being in Rome.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Also, I bet a lot of the people complaining about that loved 300 and will tell people how it's actually really deep and has an important message

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 13 points 4 days ago

The message of 300 was deep. We need more hot man on man action films.

[-] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If I paint abs on my flap does it count?

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

of course it counts! it's my only hope

[-] Cytobit@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago

Hasn't pretty much every period piece ever produced been criticized through the lens of historical accuracy?

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

...not barry lyndon...

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 days ago

whereas no-one seemed to give a shit about all the inaccuracies in the Gladiator movies for example.

Do you know that for a fact? Or did you just not pay attention?

[-] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago

That or the fact that a trans person played a supporting role

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

the horror!!!! someone I don't know does something different from what I would do!!! it's the end of the world I taell ya

[-] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Also no greek representation

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Saw a lot of talk about the accents and the period incorrect uniforms. But yeah, internet gonna internet.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Even if that were the case, the Odyssey is a work of fiction; we don't even know if Homer actually existed, if he was a single person or multiple story tellers blended together by lack of details...

"Critics" pretending to know and be outraged about X not been exactly what they thought when they read the book cliff notes in their mom's sock smelling basement are just noise

[-] ImADifferentBird@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's so weird to be complaining about the accents. It's a movie that takes place in ancient Greece, FFS; we have no idea what their accents would sound like if they were somehow capable of speaking modern English, since their entire culture pre-dates audio recording technology (and modern English, for that matter) by multiple millenia.

Seriously, people are just weirdly conditioned to the classical world speaking with a British accent for some reason, I guess.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the people that complaint about accents probably would walk away if the movie was actually made in ancient greek with subtitles

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

even so, who cares? it's not a documentary

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yes, I agree with you. Those were simply additional bloviated discussions I saw.

[-] popcar2@piefed.ca 16 points 4 days ago

To be fair, the trailers weren't very flattering. I wasn't expecting the movie to be that good either.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, that's fair. I didn't think the trailers were amazing either, although it did seem like they were purposefully not giving too much away, which I appreciate. But people got really hung up on the smallest details to prematurely declare it a bad movie.

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Of all the times for a movie trailer to finally show restraint, not spoiling the plot of a movie based on a ~3000 year old epic poem sure is something.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Which seems kinda crazy because wasn't the internet absolutely glazing Christopher Nolan just a couple years ago?

I still like his Dark Knight trilogy, and Inception is still fairly original.

That was before he cast a black woman to play "the face that launched a thousand ships" and a trans man to play... well, anyone, really.

It's just all stupid culture war bullshit.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Ah. Then I'll continue to enjoy his movies.

[-] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Not really. He's not as overrated as he used to be. People have started seeing through his Grand visuals combined with a heavy score. He's being heavily criticised for not able to write female characters.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 days ago

I've had Christopher Nolan in the "Hit or miss" category since Interstellar and Dunkirk. Interstellar was so shit

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
124 points (95.6% liked)

movies

3681 readers
370 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS