1077
Unicorn cake (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Whether it's true or not is beside the point. It's plausible, that's enough. It's plausible, because similar things do happen all the time. People are mostly kind and thoughtful, and it's good to be reminded of that.

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

I bought a homeless looking woman lunch on my card a few weeks ago, because I didn't have any cash to give her. Does me telling my family how good it made me feel cheapen the act? I'd like to hope not, because from my eyes it's not self congratulatory, it's sharing something small they were able to do for another person because it makes them happy. I don't get the negativity in these threads.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You just told all of Lemmy about it. That woman is now hungry again and it was all for nothing :(

Edit: y'all need some sarcasm lessons and fuck off with bashing people who do good deeds

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

“You didn’t completely change that person’s life and solve all of their problems forever, so you’re just a performative, egotistical, self-fellating waste of time and I hate you because there is no greater reward or provided innate comfort for continuing to survive and suffer the aspects of life in general!” - You.

[-] BitchPeas@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Yeah let's all stop showering, sleeping, and eating because its just gonna need to be done again.

Hey friend. I had these thoughts. Generalized Anxiety Disorder with a hearty side of CPTSD and clinical depression was the diagnosis.

Chunk that shit.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

I have no idea what you're on about

[-] BitchPeas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You claim that because the woman would be hungry again, the action was meaningless.

We all get hungry again. It doesn't diminish that we ate before. Or that we must eat again, even though we just ate.

I am drawing a line between this fatalistic black and white thinking of "well then it's pointless" to my own experience with mental illness.

Chunking is a cognitive technique which orders information or tasks into smaller segments in order to avoid being overwhelmed.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago
[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Its a joke bro

That's all I see

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it

Damn, got me bro

[-] BitchPeas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oooh. Your joke wasn't very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time.

Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right.

It just wasn't a very clearly executed joke.

A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity.

And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

I don't understand why you're trying to justify being perceived as a jerk

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

You can tell a true war story by the questions you ask. Somebody tells a story, let's say, and afterward you ask, "Is it true?" and if the answer matters, you've got your answer.

For example, we've all heard this one. Four guys go down a trail. A grenade sails out. One guy jumps on it and takes the blast and saves his three buddies.

Is it true?

The answer matters.

You'd feel cheated if it never hapened. Without the grounding reality, it's just a trite bit of puffery, pure Hollywood, untrue in the way all such stories are untrue. Yet even if it did happen--and maybe it did, anything's possible--even then you know it can't be true, because a true war story does not depend upon that kind of truth. Absolute occurrence is irrelevant. A thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth. For example: Four guys go down a trail. A grenade sails out. One guy jumps on it and takes the blast, but it’s a killer grenade and everybody dies anyway. Before they die, though, one of the dead guys says, “The fuck you do that for?” and the jumper says, “Story of my life, man,” and the other guy starts to smile but he’s dead.

That’s a true story that never happened.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Things_They_Carried

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

What didn't you like? I don't remember too much about it (we had it for like 9th grade English) but I thought it was a good read.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

because it pushes the common sentiment in American literature that the only relevant truth is our subjective experiences and mythology of individual egotism. it's reductionist and sentimentalist. I read it in 9th grade too.

I think reality and truth exist outside of individuals, and that they matter. Which is never a popular sentiment, and increasingly has become less of one as of late as folks seem to be moving toward group solipsism.

More broadly, I generally don't like American literature, because I find it way too navel-gazing, sentimental, and self-congratulatory. I prefer non-American literature because it tends to have a more grounded view of the world that's more embedded in real history, than Americans and their obsession with their own uniqueness and exceptionalism and standing 'outside history'. I also resent how American English is taught as if America and UK literature is the only relevant one in the world... and typically only likes foreign authors if their work is Americanized or fits the American cultural narrative.

I hated English class in general, except Shakespeare and the Ancient Greeks and even more since discovered there is this whole other world of great lit out there that isn't taught in American classrooms because it's 'scary and weird' to Americans, teachers and students alike. Even to this day, people come to my house and tell my how 'weird' my books are because so much of it is European/Asian and it's full of different ideas than American ones.

it would be really interesting to talk a class on American literature in a foreign country, or just a class in America without the instructor jerking off about how American authors are the most deep and profound people on the earth and subject (often drug fueled) feelings are the ultimate truth/experience in life. Every English or writing class I've ever taken comes off like nationalist propaganda to me... and actually I read a few books about how USA entire English/writing higher ed infrastructure was funded by the CIA to precisely do that... which confirmed my suspicions about it the entire time.

I think the only American author I really liked is Melville, because his work was anti-egotistical and kind of went at the American mythology of egotistical individualism and the idea that truth only exists 'inside us', where as most American authors, past and present, seem to embrace that idea as gospel.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

people are mostly kind and thoughtful to people they identify with and think who are part of their tribe. they want to help 'good people who are struggling'

they are most cruel and nasty to people who they don't feel this way about. what do you think the owner would have done if the customer had been a black man vs a white woman?

statically, the variance in how they'd be treated is fucking insane. and you'd have comments here vigoriously defending her right to feel afraid/threatened/alarmed, instead of sympathetic and giving.

[-] locahosr443@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This reveals more about you rather than making any kind of point.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yes, anyone who mentions bad things happen is a bad person, clearly.

if only we every thought happy thoughts, nothing bad would ever happy and we'd all be perfect people.

must be nice to live in such absolute world wherever everyone who isn't you is the problem. and the facts of a objective reality don't exist.

we should also kill all sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, because their research is negative or something

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
1077 points (96.3% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

11371 readers
727 users here now

PLEASE NOTE !wholesome@reddthat.com IS MORE ACTIVE

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

  1. No politics. So no mentioning government officials etc

Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

  1. !dadforaminute@lemmy.world

  2. !wholesome@reddthat.com

  3. !superbowl@lemmy.world

...

Reach out to @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.~~___~~___

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS