you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The Supreme Court just ruled that it's not racism unless someone specifically points at an action and says "I'd like to do that racism, please!" and so I expect them to use that precedent to target people with disabilities. "They didn't say it out loud, and even though a policy specifically harmed the disabled, it doesn't count"

Edit. Louisiana v Callais

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_v._Callais

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    Ah you see your honour it can't be illegal, because it's actually more profitable this way, and so conform to the natural order of the brotherhood of the ever rising line (forever may it rise, straight and true)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    This is basically it and how I see it working at places I've worked at. HR gathers information about you and then uses it to fire you when firing you is necessary....when you're no longer needed. So for example if you're an assembly worker and your product is end of production, you're done. Now engineering goes to work on a new trinket and you gotta wait until they are done. But when engineering is done, they're fucked. Now you're king because there's production to be done while engineering scrambles to figure out a new project that management wants to work on.

  • source
  • parent