1111
It's rigged (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Social Securiry benefits are paid out based in how much you earned during your working years. If you earned more money while working, you get higher monthly benefits when you retire. Up to a certian point:

These benefits cap out at a certain limit. Accordingly, the social security taxes also cap out at a certain limit. Beyond that income you do ‘t get any higher Social Security benefits and you don’t pay any higher Social Security taxes.

This is because Social Security is not designed to be a progressive tax like the income tax is.

Our tax system overall should be more progressive. Maybe social security should be part of that. But it was never designed to do this.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Our tax system overall should be more progressive

Tax brackets are the fundamental way that income tax is used regressive: the higher your income, the higher percentage you pay on that (marginal) income

In addition to “income” shenanigans available to the wealthy, the highest tax bracket is at $750,000 (couples filing jointly). While that’s certainly a lot of income, the percentage never goes higher. Someone earning that pays the same percentage on marginal income as a ten millionaire or a hundred millionaire or a billionaire. It stops progressing

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

We need to bring back the 92% (marginal) tax bracket.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
1111 points (98.4% liked)

Work Reform

16834 readers
342 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS