view the rest of the comments
Not Just Bikes
A Community for the Not Just Bikes YouTube & Nebula channel run by Jason Slaughter.
Official channels:
- https://www.youtube.com/@NotJustBikes
- https://nebula.tv/notjustbikes
- https://social.notjustbikes.com/@notjustbikes
- https://www.patreon.com/notjustbikes
NOTE: This is an unofficial Community in no way affiliated with NotJustBikes or Jason Slaughter.
RULES
1. Be nice. Please.
I know it's the internet, but be nice. And report trolls & spammers.
2. Stay on topic
Try to stick to posts and comments related to the themes of NJB videos, or content creation. Things like urban planning, mobility & transportation, social equity, Dutch culture, etc..
3. No Trolling
Go troll somewhere else. We don't need that shit here.
4. No comment screenshots
Please don't post screenshots of stupid comments as a post. We all know there are ignorant morons online, we don't need to bring even more attention to their stupid comments.
5. No vehicular cycling
Jason has no patience for advocates of vehicular cycling, and neither do we. You can talk about vehicular cycling, but if you promote it as an alternative to safe bike infrastructure, you may be banned. You can post that crap somewhere else.
6. No people being hit by cars/road violence
Do not show videos or pictures of people being hit by cars, or other road violence. We don't need to see that shit. We know cars are dangerous, and many people have bad memories of car crashes. Keep it out of this subreddit.
7. No tone policing
We don't need any more tone police. If you don't like the tone that Not Just Bike takes in his videos, there's a very easy solution: stop watching them.
I'm anti-copyright in general*, and especially in favour of stronger fair use–type laws to allow remixing. But as far as copyright does go, this doesn't actually sound all that egregious to me. The fault lies mostly with the musician that Mumbo Jumbo licensed from, rather than with Warner Chappell themselves. The ideal would probably be that MJ could keep the music up and the licenser would have to pay the entire cost of it to WC. But that's a rather difficult thing to expect.
* sort of... Under capitalism it's absolutely necessary that artists can protect their works in some form to be able to make a living, and I'm not entirely sure how to square that with the idea that artistic expression should be free.