215
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
215 points (95.4% liked)
Linux
14365 readers
344 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
If you used the GUI app you probably wouldn't see that your system uses different package standards
The GUI that came with my distro only covers 2 of the 4 package managers I mentioned. And I'd have to use a GUI
Is there a good reason to use more package managers? When I need packages that aren't provided by the distro I'm using, I change distro
Yes. Firstly because no distro has everything in their respositores, and secondly because different package managers serve different purposes.
The closest to an all-encompassing package manager is perhaps Arch with AUR, though you are forced to use tools beyond pacman if you want actual package management for the AUR packages. AUR has also shown itself to be a massive liability, since the only way the project has been able to cover as much software as it does, is by doing next to no vetting of the submitted packages. With predictable results