view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.

Copying my comment from another thread
Idk why everyone is always looking at statcounter. I still feel like Cloudflare probably has better data.
Especially cause it feels like their "other" category is probably scrappers and bots.
Also noteworthy is that Cloudflare isn't about Desktop operating systems only. I don't know how StatCounter operates, but they probably ignore everything that is identified as mobile and Smart TV. Cloudflare is about ANY HTTP connection / request. So its natural that these numbers are quite different, as they are different in their scope anyway.
Liek said, all data is biased, and that's why we sould rely on multiple sources. The absolute values are really hard to get a precise mapping of, but the trends seem to be consistent. There's a recent dip in windows usage in that chart as well
I don't think one data point is better than the other. They are all a small portion of the entire base. Its like looking at different game reviews from different people to get an idea how good it is (I know little odd comparison :D). In example Cloudflare data is only relevant to those communities and sites that can pay for it and don't have a different solution. Cloudflare is also a "recent" phenomenon; not sure how relevant that info is though...
They're both likely biased in different ways, different goals to a point. It sounds like statcounter is making some effort to verify unique devices for determining numbers potentially, but Cloudflare looks like it's just raw requests which is going to bias you towards the noisiest devices. Still useful but I feel like that's a harder sell if you're trying to determine market share specifically. I'm not sure how you'd improve either one without drastically raising your overhead.