He says dont pay for public transit because most dont use it.
He then says dont pay for public transit because it is not accessible.
He says it is almost free, which is bad, because he pays for that too.

How are you going to make public transit more accessible without paying for more Public transit? How are you going to get people to use public transit, if it is not affordable?
This logic is often levied at public transit, whilst private automobiles go interrogated. Like it is here. Its not a good argument. Its basic boomer mentality. And its even worse, since he makes it explicitly about himself.

Don't burden taxpayers for extremely costly public transit — almost free for bus riders — when most never use public transit. Transit is not available in most neighborhoods. 90-year-olds cannot walk a block to ride a bus, much less a mile.

"Well I can't walk a block, so that means no one should get to use it."
Neat. Lets cut off dialysis funding then.

Why waste our tax dollars for the minority of Indianapolis residents who use their bikes to drive to work while ignoring repair of roadways and street markings.

Bikes damage roads way less, which increases their longevity. The infrastructure is also typically cheaper and you see more people binding the better the infrastructure is.

Another argument is that public education needs less money, since its doing really poorly. That's not a good argument.

We need reduced state, county and local taxes and reduced welfare subsidies for those aged 18 to 64 who are able bodied but do not work to fully pay for their welfare subsidies.

"Fuck you, give me mine"