99

"Accumulation through waste"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

in this context downplaying the severity of the drop people actually experienced

Well.. no, it isn't downplaying it. It's representing it perfectly. That's quite literally the point.

When graphs aren't zero-based, you immediately make a bad intellectual assumption as well as an 'emotional' reaction to the size of the graph. That immediate bad assumption poisons the way you think. We can't eliminate that 'emotional' reaction, but we can (and do) standardise it and we consequently learn to gauge appropriately.. only so long as people keep to that standard.

The only time you shouldn't zero-base a graph is when the change is too small to reasonably decipher without enlarging the scale. I'll die on that hill. If you do it for any other reason, you are just engaging in misleading emotional manipulation. There's a place for emotional appeal, but by means of making you misunderstand reality isn't it.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
99 points (91.6% liked)

memes

23846 readers
314 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS