2.5 vs 3.5 HDD (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by pastermil@sh.itjust.works to c/datahoarder@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm looking to get a new internal hard drive for a specific use case:

it's for a desktop, meaning I can fit either
i need 2TB, no more and no less, also meaning I can get either
it's for my media collection, mostly movies
it's not gonna be read-only, but I wouldn't write too often (I would torrent, but all the program's metadata would be on another drive)
most likely gonna be formatted with btrfs (subject to change, open to suggestion)

Should I get the 2.5 inch or the 3.5 one?

Thanks in advance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago

Lol you should get a M.2 then.

[-] Korkki@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

If the use is media and file storage, then ssd is not a cost effective solution.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I'm not gonna break my bank for nothing...

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026

5 points (85.7% liked)

datahoarder

10493 readers

21 users here now

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

archivist@lemmy.ml