205
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 22 points 6 days ago

Why have a big gap underneath the graph? It is totally normal to adjust the axis to fit the data. This isn't a conspiracy, it's standard math.

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I’m not saying it’s a conspiracy like the guy you replied to, but it’s generally considered correct to include 0 on graphs like this to show proper scale. If I had submitted a paper with this graph in grad school, all of my reviewers would have kicked it back.

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip -4 points 6 days ago

If you want to get technical, it's only standard math if there's a symbol indicating the scale doesn't start at 0. Data is used like this all the time to misrepresent reality and yes, it's considered "normal" to do things that way.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
205 points (95.6% liked)

Data is Beautiful

3812 readers
153 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS