42
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)
politics
23093 readers
333 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I'll believe it when this "secret constitution" is on literally ANY offical DPRK sources. It's not on any of them. I'm not taking my information on what the DPRK's constitution says from the US and South Korea.
I wonder what the secret hidden real U.S. constitution says
it's just a list of phone numbers for epstein and the other networks.
Written at the back of the Epstein 50th birthday book.
I'll have you know that Jim Burgerton of the American Freedom Eagle Institute has on very good authority that the defectors he paid to say it exists say that it exists.
I don't understand why they had this whole segment about the "new secret constitution" when the striking down of reunification was all very public with the destruction of the Arch of Reunification and public speeches.
The cessation of reunification is smart in that it pops the bubble of the ROK being able to justify its militarization (and subjugation to the US military) through the propagandized threat of the DPRK.
I suspect it's propaganda built around the knowledge they've got from spies that a rewrite of the constitution has been in the works through their structures. I bet it's not actually finalised and active, hasn't been voted on, is still going through various stages of revision, etc etc. This explains why it's not on any official source, because it's not currently the constitution.
When it finally does get the stamp of approval the west will resoundingly go "SEE! SECRET CONSTITUTION! WE WERE RIGHT!"