162
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If they widened the roads to be able have space to make the lane id say it is. If they just threw it in there and made a uncomfortable spot to bike id say not.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And millions of drivers would disagree. The study is clear. If a driver doesn't fear hitting something they mostly disregard painted lanes. Without protection, bikers fear the lane with good reason.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I didnt say they wouldn't. But its still infrastructure if they widened the roads for it.

[-] DaleGribble88@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

But since automobiles use it and bicyclist don't, the point is that makes it more car infrastructure not bicycle infrastructure

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago

And important that the bike lane doesn't go over sewer grates 🤦

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That sir is not a bike lane hahaha.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
162 points (100.0% liked)

science

28116 readers
407 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS