progress (thelemmy.club)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 3 months ago (26 children)

people who don't care to do those things are using ai for them, leaving the people who do care, and usually spent a large part of their life learning how to do those things well, with nothing to do.

incidentally, learning how to do something properly makes it easier to see how bad ai is at that thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You aren't using the dockworker's services either. Work changes in time. There are still people who sew by hand too, but you can also buy affordable clothes if you are poor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    i do though. i order packages and the dockworkers take them off of the ship and load them onto local transport. i take a ferry and the dockworkers make sure the ship is securely tied off before i dinembark.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    In the time before containerization a lot of people used to be dock workers. Today virtually noone is a dockworker anymore. That's what I was referring to.

    That's a large part of how the world became as connected as it is today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Remember, if you copy and paste from stack, you're a bad developer.

    Too many developers think they code better than they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    How many are actually going to do repetitive, menial coding work so that some people who enjoy that for whatever reason would have "something to do"?

    Sounds like a big ask. Besides, if you enjoy coding that, I don't think anyone is preventing you from doing that. Unless it is work, as said. Then you have to do whatever they tell you to. In that case there's no decision to use or not to use it either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    i was more thinking about art or writing, but if you're doing repetitive menial coding work then there have been tools to replace that for like 50 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    Yeah this is just another tool for that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    that sets fire to a tree for every sentence, yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    I don't think those using it care tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    nope, that's pretty obvious. it's easier to visualise with local models that make the apartment heat up a few degrees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Is it really that intensive with coding? For image/video generation I've heard it's pretty bad but coding seems like a less intensive task. But so is gaming tbh, that heats up my apartment plenty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    it's the same thing, image generation just takes longer. per output.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    That sounds like image generation is more taxing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    in the same way that playing minecraft for two hours is "more taxing" than playing for one, sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Two games was actually the example I had in mind, with them both demanding resources but the other being much more taxing on the system, yeah

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    well that's not what's going on. there's a reason i explained it the way i did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It uses less system resources vs you use it for less time, the result is the same? I don't see the difference myself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    both scenarios use the same amount of resources but one uses them for longer. that's not "more taxing".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    You are saying it uses the same amount of computing power, but the time is different? I guess I was more concerned about resource use. If you drive your car 100 or 200 km, it might use the same amount of fuel per km but you end up using more fuel on the longer drive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    yes. it's not more resource intensive, it's just doing more iterations.

    and from my measurements, spending 15-30 seconds on max power draw is not a lot compared to gaming for an hour. datacenters use less power per iteration than my gpu, but they run all the time.

  • source
  • parent