664
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here is the thing, the people who are typically stealing formula, diapers, laundry detergent, razors, etc. aren’t stealing 1-2 packs for their own use.

Those items are stolen in bulk by more organized shoplifters who will hit half a dozen stores in a day and literally fill carts and then resell them because they are easy to move, relatively shelf stable, etc.

Morally, I am a bit conflicted. Fuck large corpos, but large corpos take large shrink (what theft, damaged goods, etc are called) budget overages out on the stores with less hours available for employees…

So yeah, fuck big box stores and if people are stealing food, look the other way. Organized theft? Idk, hurts the employees more than the big box store

Edit: Since people are doubting what I am saying, I’ve witnessed and experienced this first hand at retail stores.

Here are some additional sources.

https://abcnews.com/US/baby-formula-targeted-organized-retail-theft-rings/story?id=13293485

https://www.tampabay28.com/news/region-hillsborough/alleged-shoplifting-ring-faces-rico-charges-after-stealing-baby-formula-throughout-florida

A simple web search of “shoplifting ring baby formula” yields dozens of results.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 26 points 2 days ago

Idk, hurts the employees more than the big box store

Wut, how are employees hurt in any way ?

Should probably look at the corpos like Nestle's extortionate pricing of newborn supplies to the point that a black market emerges first. (And then whining about low birth rate)

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Because in some (most) parts of this world, the concept is

Privatize profit, socialize losses.

So the company gets to keep all profit during good times, but employees "solidarily pay" for the losses.

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

If the store budgets to lose 1% of their goods to shrink, and the store exceeds that budget, then corporate will make the budget up in other ways.

When I worked retail, the largest budget item was labor. You can cut labor fairly easy to make up for shortfalls on other budgetary items, leaving a skeleton crew

[-] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Then why are they ever running any more than a skeleton crew? For fun? You claim they could easily cut labor, but if it was that easy then they would've done it already. They're always looking to maximize profit.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Skeleton crews are overworked and burn out faster, leading to more turnover. They may save you money in the short term but they cost more money in the long term. They also open the door for more shoplifting, as an understaffed store is an easy mark. Lastly, they reduce sales because a poorly staffed store is a messy and understocked store. If things get bad enough, people stop shopping there outright. No one wants to shop in a place that feels dirty and unsafe.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

For a store to actually run well you need more than a skeleton crew.

But it's definitely possible to scale down a couple days of the week and make your employee's lives hell.

If you always run a skeleton crew, eventually the store starts to get unorganized and boxes of packed inventory begin piling up everywhere

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, so the store can't actually "cut labor fairly easy".

[-] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

Nice can you back this up with any evidence?

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I provided evidence to a sub comment.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sure you could also pull up stories of the "welfare queen" by searching those words, but that doesn't mean it's as widespread or as big of a problem as portrayed.

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Ok. So what source is acceptable to you?

I provided my experience, then was asked for evidence. I then provided evidence and that isn’t good enough.

Please provide counter evidence before complaining that my evidence is not good enough. You are placing the burden entirely on me and that isn’t how fair and equitable debate should work.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
664 points (99.4% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3327 readers
408 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS