you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 52 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

I read an interview, probably from NPR, but I can't find it at the moment. The upshot was that caring for infants is insanely expensive, since they need one-on-one care pretty much continuously.

But parents can't afford that cost, so, essentially, the price they charge for infant care is a loss-leader, and parents of older children (who need less supervision and thus more favorable staffing ratios) subsidize the cost of caring for infants. Daycare operators are barely keeping afloat.

Edit: Ah, here it is: Baby's first market failure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    They may require 1-on-1 interaction, but generally the ratio for 0-2's is around 1:4.

    And many childcare companies are owned by huge multi-billion dollar investment firms because they are cash generators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment