79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm stickin' with MP3s. Don't care what the socialists are doing.

Performance specifications reveal both the technology's strengths and current limitations. Write speeds range between 8 and 10 MB/s, while read speeds reach 50 to 200 MB/s. The drives are write-once media — data cannot be erased or rewritten once stored — making them unsuitable for active storage workloads but ideal for archival and cold storage applications.

Would be cool to have glass discs as a long-term storage media like some '90s anime GIF.

[-] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Insert the data crystal.

At 10MB/s write it would take a year and 2 months to write all that. Oyi!

[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 15 points 21 hours ago

With 360 TB, I'd be torrenting everything in existence, keeping offline archives of useful datasets, and maybe start hustling copies of Anna's Archive or the entire Spotify catalog leak.

Since most media will never need to be changed, you only need to make sure to organize everything beforehand.

Even then, since the volume is so big, it seems like you could simply keep appending shit, even modified files, from one end of the disk, and maintain a database record of the current sectors containing those files and keep it on the opposite end of the disk, so it can also infinitely grow from the other direction. Or maybe append changes as diffs to the original data.

I wonder if there is a filesystem format that would be particularly suited to this, or if something more specialized would need to be developed.

Just freeing up the faster, writable NVMe space would be a huge win. Seems great for a NAS even with the limitations.

[-] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

btrfs on linux, zfs on pretty much everything, and apfs on apple (CoW filesystems) already append new data blocks to the end of the drive rather than modify existing ones. obviously if this is gonna become a thing they would need to do it with the metadata too. the problem with that is the longer the drive is in use, the more metadata you have to read in to use it. probably easier to use a traditional drive just for the metadata.

besides that, cd/dvd/blu-ray filesystems are all adapted for write-once media. actually, they're purpose-built for pretty much this exact thing (besides the size of the disks they support). so never mind all that other shit i just said

[-] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

My "National Anthem of the USSR" midi file I've somehow kept since I had dial up internet and Windows ME will be buried/cremated/lost at sea with me.

[-] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Same with me but it's a MIDI transcription of the Ryo-Ku-Bu OP.

[-] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

An Imgur link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
79 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24384 readers
281 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS