you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 3 months ago* (23 children)

Oh no, they definitely read it. They just don't care and expect you to let them merge.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago (19 children)

    Because that's the correct procedure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    No its not. If all the cars are in one lane and you drive past all of those cars in the empty lane and then expect all those cars you passed to let you merge, you're a piece of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (12 children)

    Why would all of the cars be in one lane before the other lane closes? That's silly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    I hate to break it to you, but you have to merge before the lane closes. If it's 20 feet or 200 feet, you're still merging before the lane is closed.

    Guess how fast you eat up hundreds of feet at highway speeds? In seconds.

    If you want traffic to stay at highway speeds, you ALWAYS merge before you HAVE to leave your lane.

    It's the same principle with on ramps. The people racing up an on-ramp just to wedge into slower traffic are helping no one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Hate to break it to you but literally every other country on earth zipper merges and it's far more efficient

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Yes, they're more efficient. They're also more efficient than rushing up to the end of a closing lane and merging into an ALREADY FULL through-lane. That is NOT zipper merging. It is cutting in line. That will always, ALWAYS, reduce throughput. Period.

    You cannot cheat physics and human predictability. Rushing to the end of a closed lane WILL NEVER INCREASE THROUGHPUT. Period,

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    zipper gif

    If you're talking about doing it at 60 you can still use both lanes as long as you aren't following the car in front of you dangerously close or jerks who don't let merges in there'll already be enough room to merge. Cutting to one lane early is like people who don't use the on ramp to accelerate and slow everyone down when they merge then accelerate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago

    The vast majority of situations where people are making faces at the assholes sitting at the end of the closed lane is when traffic is already over-dense and going slow.

    In those situations, which are often, racing to the end of the closing lane is just being a line-cutting shithead, and has nothing to do with zipper merging. At that point, they're literally only butting in on through-traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    Because the sign clearly says "lane closure ahead merge now."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    No, it doesn't. It never would, because NHTSA knows that utilizing all lanes during a lane closure reduces backups. Show me a sign where it tells drivers to merge now that isn't at the actual merge and I will eat a hat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It does NOT reduce backups. You cannot magically increase throughput by cramming in before the bottleneck. It can reduce how physically long a backup gets, which can keep backups from growing off of the highway. Though you still cannot magically add throughput by cramming in ahead of a bottleneck. Ever. Period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You can add throughput by zipper merging predictably all day long instead of every car jockeying for position and feeling entitled to block other road users from legally merging and causing all kinds of road rage based holdups though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Yes, if people were able to drive like robots. Though once traffic is already slow in the through-lanes, rushing up to the end of the closed lane and cramming in HURTS THROUGHPUT. Always. For ever. Period.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah you dumbass. So use both lanes and then zipper merge where they merge

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    In sorry, but if all the cars are in the open lane and you zoom passed in the closing lane, I'm not going to let you merge. Deal with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Bonus point for the fuckers that speed up in order to pass as many people as possible before forcing their way into the exit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Few things bring me joy like showing just a wee bit of room to bait those fools to try to cut a dozen people off just to slowly close the gap as they approach my blind spot and force them behind me

    I watch people get out of line then dash down the single file all to get 4 cars ahead so they get to work 4sec faster. No sympathy for antisocial scum

  • source
  • parent