205
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by Wudi@feddit.uk to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Flower@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago

What they're interested in, is increasing number of births. Turns out, that does go up, with a whopping 1.7%. So a 1.83 fertility rate (Louisiana) would go to 1.86, still below replacement rate and still keeps decreasing.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

The bans are about control though, not birth rate. Scientists should check Smug Satisfaction levels in those states

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It can be both. I'm not saying it is. I can't read minds. Just saying it's a possibility. There's not much that happens for just a singular reason.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
205 points (99.5% liked)

science

27243 readers
756 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS