9
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
9 points (58.5% liked)
movies
3543 readers
329 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Okay, but are we now downvoting media based on a single person involved? Because, maties-- there's been a metric fuck-tonne of films and media produced by describably awful people, going back 100yrs, easily.
Yeah, and right-wing shitheads have always be an ongoing problem, we know this, but the particular reviewer skill has always been the ability to 'separate art from artist.'
So yeah, it suggests right here to get the flock over yourselves, and grow the ability to examine a piece upon its own merits. Thank you.
@LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
It shouldn't be controversial to think mel Gibson things suck and that he should go away.
That would be a pretty brain-dead take if you're familiar with his actual filmic history, and I say that as someone who's never been a personal fan of his.
Enjoy your meaningless upvotes, though.
An antisemite who hasn't made a movie worth a shit in 20+ years can eat shit, and so can anyone who sticks up for him.
Haha, nice little narrative twist, there.
Oh well, enjoy your burning, righteous toxicity.
Once again a perfectly massive misreading of my entire set of points. I.e. Jews are some of the most awesome people I know, but Zionists..? Not so much.
You and your ridiculous whitewashing of anything that doesn't meet your exact standards is just... unfortunate to me, and always will be.
I have no idea what you're talking about but you definitely stood up for mel Gibson as one of these "it is required to separate the art from the artist" bullshit arguments. No one knows wtf you're babbling about other than that.
Ah... good ol' weasel-words, is it not?
(psst-- do you also paint your face orange in imitation?)
Yeap! That's the core argument right there. Well-recognised. And if you're on the other side... yeah, I get it.
Problem..?
Are you high? Do you think I'm someone else?
Absolutely no one is required to separate art from artist and you telling me that may as well be you telling me to like a food I dislike. It's idiotic.
Well, you're certainly not Dick Tracy! LOL
So yes, you're high. Got it. I don't get that stupid when I'm high but it makes sense that others do.
You got nothin' and you know it.
Just a sanctimonious attitude, and an asshole, just like we all have. Allowing the pooping out of nonsense opinion that was temporarily upvoted.
Right back to being a toddler in diapers, is it not? :D
Go simp for mel Gibson some more. And then rage at people who speak against it. It's not weird and it's a very good use of time. Think of all the popularity contests you'll win! neo-Nazis are gonna love you.
Interesting how your missed every single point, all the way. Is it an ego thing, or...?
There was one point. Fuck mel Gibson and his simps. Bye.
Exactly.
And here's a toast upon you honestly stating that upfront, next time?
Yeah, bye.
I did. Maybe learn to read before engaging in a masturbatory rage fest in text?
blubluhbluhbluh...
You're bad at trolling
You are snarking at someone whose Lemmy instance literally disabled downvoting when it was initially rolled out. I couldn't downvote someone even if I wanted to. It's also a major part of why I chose this instance. I never see downvotes, I only see upvotes.
Go preach and take your bullshit ass assumptions to someone else, shitbird. I can have my own opinion and it doesn't mean I'm reflexively downvoting... Which leads me to...
Last but not least... I had actually upvoted this, motherfucker, as I always try to remember to do with threads I interact with. Why? Because Lemmy doesn't have a lot of traffic and activity, so any interaction that boosts interaction is positive, especially if it fosters discussion, even if I myself am just pissing into the wind. Upvote histories on Lemmy are actually visible behind the scenes as well, so it's not impossible for you to check this (fairly sure it includes timestamps as well, so it can show I upvoted before this comment was made). (EDIT: looks like you have to use something like mbin/kbin or apps that show this info[havent tried yet], or you have to be an admin. EDIT II: You can definitely see them with timestamps on mbin, but currently the mbin server I joined only has recent post for me as of three hours ago and not current, see bottom of post Figure EDIT II)
God you couldn't have picked a worse target to shit all over.
Figure EDIT II (enlarge in new tab if needed):
rofl you think votes have meaning as to what gets traction outside of Lemmy!?
Congratulations for missing 99% of the relevant points, lol.
Oh well... angry gonna angry, and self-righteous gonna self-righteous? XD
Hey guess what its stupid when you yell your relevant point at someone who has nothing to do with the point you're making yet choosing them specifically to single out. Maybe choose to shit on someone who actually disagrees with your take. The main point is that people are downvoting it, you don't actually know if I ever intend to view the art on it's own merits, you're making a shit ass assumption because other people are downvoting it and I made clear my distaste for Gibson. Fucking idiot.
Lol... how is it that you seem to turn any opportunity whatsoever in to a toxic opportunity to go to ideological battle upon your 'opponent?'
When's the last time you received a good hug, for example?
Want a hug, matey...? ❤️
I just checked my own post history and it's interesting because I have to go back 2 and a half months to even find a thread where I had a genuine disagreement with someone. But sure, months of being involved in friendly helpful conversations has no bearing, nor does the fact that I was accused of something I wasn't doing in this instance. Yeah, I really turn any opportunity whatsoever to argue, sure guy, just as I'm sure that when someone accuses you of something you're not doing you definitely don't feel upset about it all ever for sure.
Oh, is it necessary now to post our online CV's in order to try to strengthen our arguments? Along with the virtue-signalling?
That could be fun.
Anyway, I recall your basic premise being highly flawed, and I vaguely recall that being what we were arguing about. I also seem to recall you getting personal for no apparent reason. In truth, I was also tossing a couple back last night, and probably responded somewhat along those lines.
I'll look over what the argument was about later, and respond if I think it necessary. Ta-ta for now.