you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 8 points 4 months ago (16 children)

Why should people have to prove that they got things legally to the police?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    Because of taxes. It's pretty standard practice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Those aren't submitted to the police

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    So you're ok with people proving to the government that they got things legally and you just have an issue with which government representative does the checking? It's a valid complaint but personally I think it's a minor issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    How is it a minor issue? There's a difference between a cop asking you to prove you own things and a government official asking you to file taxes. One is a member of a violent arm of the government which enforces laws and the other is a bureaucrat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The government doesn't just ask you to file your taxes. They can investigate what you own and ask you to prove how you got it. They can use prosecutors and police to conduct searches and investigations. The police can also inform the bureaucrat that they suspect you're braking tax laws. And yes, if the police see someone carrying a bunch of catalytic converters they can stop them and ask to prove how they got them. You're talking about it like police investigating ownership is something new and dangerous while in reality it's pretty standard thing. They will investigate all sort of suspected activity and carrying large amounts of cash or often stolen items can be one of them. This "violent arm of the government" interacts with people all the time, pretending they are some kill squads that should not get close to people unless they have evidence of crime or something is silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -8 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    People won't have to. Criminals though...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    How do you determine if someone is a criminal? Also, pretty sure the law in post applies to everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] -3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    All laws apply to everyone, but not everyone is subjected to them. If you don't have a drivers licence you're not subject to laws related to driving a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Everyone is subject to laws related to driving a car. They're not going to let you off the hook just because you don't have a licence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] [S] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, that was my point? The laws apply, but you will never have to think about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Idk man. I don't trust the cops to act in the interest of the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments