109
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/space@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

It's absolutely fantasy. No debate. So is Star Trek.

Actual science fiction is like the recent Hail Mary. Everything is based on literal real science, with maybe one "what if" kind of stretch.

[-] RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't know that i'd go that far. There is certainly debate on what constutes hard or soft sci-fi, but I'd say as long as the technology is either the focus, or is the main facilitator of the story then it's more sci-fi. In star wars there is not much technology that is necessarily required, all of it could have been replaced with fantasy elements and it's the same. It's not a focus, whereas the expanse for instance relies upon the limitations of the technology to drive the plot.

I don't know could be talking out my ass, purely vibes based genre definition.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
109 points (100.0% liked)

Space

9200 readers
60 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS