SISTER OF THE REVOLUTION WISHES TO CLARIFY THAT SHE IS AWARE THAT THE USE OF THE PASSIVE VOICE AND LANGUAGE WITH FORCEFUL OR MASCULINE CONNOTATIONS IN THE TITLE OF HER SELF-DIRECTED PASSION PROJECT PRESENTS HERSELF AS A SUBORDINATED RECIPIENT OR OBJECT IN AN UNBALANCED AND IN SOME SENSE VIOLENT RELATIONSHIP WITH A FIRST-PERSON NARRATIVE VOICE PRESUMED TO BE THAT OF A MAN; THIS WAS IN FACT A DELIBERATE ARTISTIC CHOICE ON HER PART, AS SHE WOULD LIKE VIEWERS AT HOME TO CONSIDER THE APPARENT CONTRADICTION BETWEEN THE FORMS OF THE NEW REVOLUTIONARY ERA BEING INTERTWINED WITH THE FORMS OF PRE-REVOLUTIONARY BOURGEOIS-PATRIARCHAL INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY IN HER FILM, AND PLACE THIS CONTRADICTION OF FORMS OF OPPRESSION VS LIBERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE TRANSITIONAL NATURE OF THE ONGOING PROLETARIAN SEXUAL REVOLUTION.