10
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
872 readers
65 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net). Research carried out in the UK that affects the UK as well as elsewhere is acceptable.
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our current banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Unfortunately the best solution is likely the hardest. Societal, cultural change. Reduce the amount of traffic significantly.
Instead of us all driving about in our own personal bubbles we need increased public transport. More buses and trains, means less traffic, means less collisions with animals (and pollution).
But fuck me is that an uphill battle that's been getting fought for decades. Bridges may ease the destruction, and they should be encouraged, but they can't be allowed to be viewed as a solution by the public. "It's fine now, we've got the bridges". Because as you say animals won't understand to only cross at the occasional crossing point, miles apart from each other.