Edit - for anyone that hasn't noticed, moderators/admins have removed several of my comments and locked the post so new comments can't be added.
I spent over 100k sats on 2 pieces of landfill trash, because of retailers and other websites and random people lying about LoRa mesh protocols being "open source."
The goal was already to spread the word about lies these retailers and other related sites spread, e.g. gaslighting users about end-to-end encryption, but there's no point using the network to spread the word about the lie of being open source. It's a fool's errand, the corporations already scammed my money out of me and they'll just use me to make even more money while I try to tell people to stop wasting the money. There's simply no productive point when it involves spending money on closed source proprietary shit, and lying about being open source just makes it even worse.
So now I have a SenseCap and a Wio Tracker L1 Pro shipping to me for nothing except to scrap for parts like the batteries, and throw the malware transceiver/computer parts in the garbage so nobody can use them to spread this piece of shit malware cult.
Have fun downvoting/removing/banning me, to the majority here moronic enough to side with the scammers even after reading the truth.
Don't worry, I wouldn't ban you for this.
Yes, the physical modulation implemented by LoRa transceivers is proprietary.
It is not entirely correct to say that the "mesh" itself is proprietary. Meshtastic is open source, even if it relies on proprietary radio hardware. In principle, one could take the Meshtastic codebase and adapt it to a different physical layer.
It is perfectly reasonable to reject a technology because the full stack is not open. That said, once you look closely at most modern digital and RF hardware, you are extremely likely to encounter proprietary ICs, firmware, or physical layer implementations somewhere in the stack.
This sounds like a good challenge us someone actually had the time.
Meshtastic is not "open source," you are lying.
The issue isn't the "full stack," it is the lie.
Luanti running in Windows: open source game, not open source full stack.
Team Fortress 2 running on any OS: not open source, people lie about it being open source.
Understand difference between "lie" and "open source software but not full stack"
I promise you I am not lying to you. I may be mis-understanding you.
Here is the source code for Meshtastic firmware: https://github.com/meshtastic/firmware
But I am assume that we have a different understanding of what is and what isn't open source.
Here is the homepage, and that is not what it says: https://meshtastic.org/
That's the joke
I understand you are angry but posting "you are lying" is unnecessarily hostile.
Many people, like me, are uninformed on LoRa and meshtastic.
I literally have no idea about it other than fluffy articles and YouTubers.
I do know that Linux is called OpenSource despite relying on closed source binary blobs for virtually all real world implementations.
There are many linux distributions without blobs or that let you sort these out.
While there are distros without proprietary blobs they literally don't function on anything other than Risc-V CPUs.
All Linux distros that work with AMD, Intel and ARM cpus come with proprietary CPU blobs.
You want wifi on that open source Risc V hardware? Proprietary blob.
This seems exactly like the OP's complaint. Meshtastic without the closed source doesn't do anything. Linux without the closed source CPU blobs and closed source wifi blobs doesn't do anything.