this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10186 readers
468 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A short but cogent analysis of the unexpectedly not-terrible SCOTUS emerging at the tail end of this term. Josh Marshall is a smart observer of government, and he makes an interesting argument that I think has some real value.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the Scotus that overturned Roe v. Wade? No.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t imagine you actually read the article? Otherwise you wouldn’t be arguing against a position that neither the article nor I take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right I didn't, and maybe I should have, but I would argue that it's also just unhealthy for an article to have a title that's completely antithetical to what it's actually saying.