this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
352 points (91.9% liked)

World News

32215 readers
735 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

radiation asside it's a highly toxic heavy metal yes it will cause health defects

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what's the difference between lead, tungsten, and depleted uranium? They all cause cancer and other symptoms, and both tungsten and depleted uranium must be decontaminated if the tank carrying them is destroyed.

And from what I've read you will die of the toxicity before you will die of the radiation.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So youre telling us there's an even more deadly aspect than the radiation, and youre still defending this like your life depends on it, huh?

I thought liberals had a rule against bending science to fit political agendas. Guess that's another lie you tell yourselves

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depleted Uranium isn't radioactive, really. U-238, stripped of all the U-235 (hence, depleted) is incredibly stable. While it is technically radioactive, it barely registers. So maybe learn what you're talking about?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read it again. Keyword "toxicity". No patience for you flipflopping around points like this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Your comment specifically said, "you're telling us there's an even more deadly aspect than the radiation" so I'm not sure what you're on about my guy.