15
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by rugarc@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

hi! I was discussing with a few different people about how the american working class relates to the means of production in the context of imperialism

so my setup is that in the context of imperialism, production of people’s needs mainly happens outside of america, and it seems that americans’ primary source of wealth and well-being comes from those superprofits

so then americans as a whole seem to have power in maintaining this system, from protecting it via participating in the military, working in jobs that manage this imperial system (e.g. finance, defense, etc.), selecting the american candidates that pursue their favorite imperialist policies (i.e the policies that give them a larger share of the super profits). in turn, the domestic capitalists in america need the support of the americans, so they and the americans come to an agreement on how to divide the superprofits from the factories abroad among them

so, in the broader sense of imperialism, it seems to me that american capitalists and the group of average americans share ownership in the means of production. what are everyone's thoughts?

(I edited the post to make the context clearer, originally I had asked an abstract question about ownership that didn't get at the imperialism context)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starkillerfish@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

this is how i would describe it too

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1317 readers
76 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS