84
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 37 points 5 days ago

anyone read that article?

It has absolutely zero information in it. It's a bunch of puffed up nothing. it's a website called interesting engineering but there's no engineering. it's an article with zero technical information.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 5 days ago
[-] varmint@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This article says that the iron batteries cost is as low as $76.11 per kWh, but lithium ion prices are $108 per kWh right now. I have no idea how they got to 80x cheaper in that headline

Edit: I think they're just saying that the cost of raw iron is 80x cheaper than the cost of raw lithium by weight. That's really deceptive

[-] Jabril@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

Are they including the price over time if they last significantly longer than the lithium batteries?

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

16 years, that's similar to the expected lifetime of lithium solar batteries.

[-] Jabril@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah not a very good description then

[-] microfiche@hexbear.net 22 points 5 days ago
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 5 days ago

because I looked it up after reading your comment and I don't have the powers of precognition

[-] context@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

I don't have the powers of precognition

your username rather specifically implies otherwise, yog

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 days ago
[-] TrustedFeline@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

It's from 2022, so the OP article is about more recent developments I think.

this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
84 points (97.7% liked)

technology

24348 readers
165 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS