95
China surpasses US in research spending – the consequences extend far beyond scientific ranking and clout (theconversation.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/science@lemmy.ml
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 months ago (7 children)

It's kind of annoying how every metric the gray heads use either boils down to money or is just directly money. It's like that's all that matters to them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I dont think money spent on science is necessarily a bad metric for quantifying how much a government is prioritizing science. I do agree that more money spent on science != better science. I know from my own experience in geology that there are some things that China does well and a lot that they are really behind on and there's a lot of sub-par science that comes out of China. Does that matter when science is just a numbers game in the modern context? I couldn't say

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The Clinton era proved just spending more does not equal better science.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I think it's more of a way to get a quantitative comparison rather than just being about money. Don't get me wrong, money has corrupted everything. But in certain cases when you need to compare value between things, the closest thing we have to a common denominator is moolah.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I'd say material results are a pretty good metric.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    And how do you compare the results? Can you say definitively that a cure for one disease is more important than another? What metrics do we use? Number of lives affected? Physical pain avoided? Who decides the final say in value? You need a medium to get an approximate value.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent