94
submitted 6 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I think it's more of a way to get a quantitative comparison rather than just being about money. Don't get me wrong, money has corrupted everything. But in certain cases when you need to compare value between things, the closest thing we have to a common denominator is moolah.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 5 days ago

I'd say material results are a pretty good metric.

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

And how do you compare the results? Can you say definitively that a cure for one disease is more important than another? What metrics do we use? Number of lives affected? Physical pain avoided? Who decides the final say in value? You need a medium to get an approximate value.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
94 points (99.0% liked)

Science

21039 readers
63 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS