The Federal Court has knocked back a claim from an ABC radio presenter who entered $6000 in home rent as an expense.
Archive/non-paywall link.
balls on that idiot. There's already a framework and precedent, you claim for home office / workspace as a subset of your dwelling.
you claim for home office / workspace as a subset of your dwelling.
Article suggested even that may not be lawful
I'm referring to "Additional running expenses", not the property
balls on that idiot. There's already a framework and precedent, you claim for home office / workspace as a subset of your dwelling.
Article suggested even that may not be lawful
I'm referring to "Additional running expenses", not the property