15

Australia is a global success story. The structural reforms in the 1980s and ‘90s of liberalising trade, floating the dollar and reducing government involvement in the economy ignited an unprecedented period of growth...

Crucially, this happened without a massive spike in inequality. A 2024 report from the Productivity Commission affirmed that our tax and transfer system played a significant role in redistributing income.

And while the size of government ballooned in Europe, with government expenditure soaring to around 50% of GDP (gross domestic product) in the EU, it has remained comparatively lean in Australia, staying around 24%.

Yet, unlike the US, Australia did not gut its social safety net. We deliver top-tier health outcomes, provide robust support to low-income earners and maintain a high-quality public education system.

How did we pull off this exceptional outcome? It’s largely because of something the current government seems to want to do less and less: means testing. We can see this in action with policies such as student debt cuts and electric vehicle tax concessions.

The shift towards universal policies may seem fair, but it’s creating a system that gives to the wealthy at the expense of the poor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

A fair system would require they downsize to something more reasonable and live off the proceeds if they genuinely don’t have any other source of income in retirement

Agreed and I think ironically you would then need to give concessions to people over 65, they have no reason to downsize at the moment

If you own a million dollar 3 bedroom house, after you've done it up, put it on the market, paid all the stamp duty and fee's and then bought a 1 or 2 bedroom house, you have effectively gained nothing and lost a bedroom

Hence why they'd rather hole up in their million dollar mansions because there's no incentive for them to sell it

There would need to be maybe a waiving of stamp duty or something or downsizer incentive to give people a reason to do it

Hell even if they kept all the fee's etc but said downsizing to a smaller house once you're over 65 gives a 20% boost to your pension payment or something like this, even that would be a credible incentive as there are many pensioners living in million dollar houses that are asset rich (house) but cash poor (living off the pension)

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
15 points (74.2% liked)

Australian Politics

1784 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS