87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vostok_@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

My logic is that if a country needs something, it's always better to have the ability to produce it locally, I admit I left out the crucial part of the question about cost-effectiveness. But does it matter being cost-effective when self-reliance is at stake? Cuba only has 10 million people and a relatively small land area, but it isn't Grenada, Fiji or the Maldives, I believe it can achieve a level of autarky similar to the DPRK, a country with a similar land area.

China can definitely provide over the course of years the amount of solar panels necessary to power the whole country, but what about after that? The economy must grow to provide better conditions for the people and a growing economy needs a growing power capacity. China is a reliable partner, but what about the event in which the solar panel flow stops for any reason? Ultimately I believe these questions about long term economic strategy and self-reliance are still quite important, Cuba did barely survive for a long time with the way they handled things so far, but I wish to see them truly thrive for once. It's a sad sight to see all those buildings in Havana in a state of disrepair.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

what about the event in which the solar panel flow stops for any reason?

Then you can get still many years of use out of the solar panels you have. It's not as big of a deal compared to oil getting cut off.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
87 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24378 readers
399 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS