228
submitted 1 week ago by Cataphract@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.world

T-4hrs from time of post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago

Right now, yes. If it was as commoditized as putting satellites into orbit is now, the price would be orders of magnitude lower.

But yeah the investment to get to that point would be immense and take decades.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -4 points 6 days ago

Why. Why do we need to go to the moon. To build a Subway Sandwich shop?

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

So that people like you can complain about it on the internet.

It takes a lot less to launch a rocket from the lunar surface to anywhere in the solar system than from earth. If we ever get manufacturing working on or around the moon then it opens up a lot of possibilities for larger payloads. This means we can send more further and it makes the whole process cheaper.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Because it's there.

[-] NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

There are loads of reasons but if you want a practical one we should do it for the helium 3 and other materials that can be found on the moon and in space.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
228 points (97.5% liked)

science

26425 readers
869 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS