Can someone explain why Laos is not a socialist state according to the wiki? (en.prolewiki.org)

submitted 4 months ago by Loyal_Leninist@lemmygrad.ml to c/prolewiki@lemmygrad.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The page for socialist state does not include Laos and on its own page it says it is a "people's democratic state", unlike the other AES states, which say they are socialist states. Is there a reason Laos is not considered a socialist state?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago

It looks like on the Laos page it says its a socialist state, I see that listed twice https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Lao_People%27s_Democratic_Republic

[-] Loyal_Leninist@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 months ago

I mean in the infobox under Government, it says "Unitary Marxist-Leninist people's democratic state" instead of "Unitary Marxist–Leninist socialist state", like the other AES states

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026

28 points (100.0% liked)

ProleWiki

1080 readers

1 users here now

ProleWiki

A community related to the ProleWiki project.

Post in this community to request articles, provide suggestions and discuss ways to develop our project

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml