Supreme Court rules ISPs aren't liable for user piracy without intent (www.techspot.com)

submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@europe.pub to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] cm0002@europe.pub 24 points 1 month ago

Intent meaning they're not an ISP that caters to piracy

E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026

86 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69194 readers

130 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.