26
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Patnou@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Depends on where you live. Civilized places still use paper ballots, because electronic ones are practically impossible to get verifiably trustworthy.

[-] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

I didn't even know electronic voting ballots was a thing. My state only has paper ballots.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

It's easier to falsify a paper election than a properly implemented digital voting system. Keyword being properly.

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Elections require trust. A properly designed voting system can be understood by the average voter. That's impossible with electronic voting.

[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I don't get it isn't it expensive ?

Say each machine cost $500 to buy and maintain, multiply that by 30 booths and then tens of thousands of polling stations the costs would be massive.

You can just scan the ballots in to get a quick count and then hand count them later.

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Elections are expensive anyway. You either need to maintain thousands of computers or print millions of ballots (assuming nation wide elections in most countries). But the main cost is in the organization. You need to rent it places for the polling stations, set up the booths and the whole infrastructure around it. Security and people checking ID's. Some of this will be done by volunteers in most countries, but that won't cover all the costs. In the grand scheme of things I don't thing electronic vs paper voting matters that much to the total cost of the elections.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

This is not true at all, it's much easier to falsify paper votes than it is to falsify any good electronic voting system. This is a fake news perpetuated by people who are finding difficult to falsify electronic voting systems and want to, for example in Brazil the last election held with paper ballots was in 1994, and it has been demonstrated that those results were frauds, one of the elected candidates in that election has been one of the most vocal opposers to electronic voting.

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yes it is easier to attack papier voting systems. But these attacks don't scale. This video by Tom Scott is 6 years old now, but every argument still stands. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, well we aren't talking about Brazil. My state is all paper. There are multiple audits and there are public observers at every stage. The shit would hit the fan if it was even one ballot off. It's a super transparent and auditable system.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
26 points (93.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48209 readers
550 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS