this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
256 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2235 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For all of the base-load talk, this is the real reason people are pushing nuclear.

The projects always go over budget. They always go way over time, too. Both of these things are good for the banks who loan out the billions to build new plants. And they know that if the company goes bankrupt the government will subsidize it.

Nuclear is just not economical enough to be part of a sustainable energy system.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Nuclear is just not economical enough to be part of a sustainable energy system.

It's chicken and egg. We have no experience building nuclear on budget because nuclear is too expensive.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah well.. Nuclear is too expensive and now I heard another rethoric on how renewables are not making enough profit to be worth it for the big companies. We’re going in circles before these people admit that coal and gas won’t be replaced by anything.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But miraculously that isn't the case of renewable? Let me lough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the last ten years solar power has gone down in price by 80% and is now producing more power than nuclear.

Plus when you buy a solar panel it starts making money immediately, unlike a reactor that doesn’t make money for 10-20 years after it starts up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why is Germany opening coal mines?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they won't have new nuclear plants online for a decade at least and because Putin invaded Ukraine and cut off their natural gas supply

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Too bad for the climate I guess