77

Before Gordon Brown sent a draft of his 6 February comment piece on the Jeffrey Epstein scandal to the Guardian for publication, he asked friends whether he had gone too far.

The former prime minister had written that he found it “hard to find words to express my revulsion at what has been uncovered about Epstein and his impact on our politics” and the “time is overdue to let in the light”.

On Peter Mandelson’s alleged leaking of market-sensitive documents to the disgraced financier and sex offender during the financial crisis, Brown was particularly vexed.

If it had happened, he said it would be, in his view, “a betrayal of everything we stand for as a country”.

Brown is said to have been searching through the Epstein documents himself but he has also been assisted by Clare Rewcastle, a journalist whose past investigations have included exposing corruption at the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.

Asked about Brown’s motivation, Renwick said it should be taken at face value: he had been utterly appalled by Britain’s apparent role in enabling a web of exploitation.

"He might not even be conscious of it or acknowledge it but he will feel guilty,” said a Labour insider. “He was the person who brought Mandelson back in the house.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mjr@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago

Nah, he's not Blair. Seems more likely an echo of his parents' values plus guilt at it happening while he was leader. Wasn't one parent some sort of religious minister?

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
77 points (95.3% liked)

World News

54193 readers
1686 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS