50
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

So what I'm hearing is that the absolute best thing Trump can do is attack Iran? All those consequences sound fucking great to me. Especially cutting off 20% of the world supply of oil. Completely obliterating Israel sounds great too. Where is the downside?

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Where is the downside?

Hundreds, thousands, and more innocent dead Iranians. Potential world war and nuclear armageddon.

[-] thlibos -1 points 3 days ago
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Well the destruction of Israel would be a net positive, and forcing the world to have less oil is also good for humanity. Is this the optimal outcome for humanity as a whole? No. But assuming the Mad King executes his plan to attack Iran, if the outcome described by the article comes true it's a net-good. Also consider that Trump will not do anything that is good intentionally, so we just have to look at the silver-lining, and if the destruction of Israel is part of that silver-lining then it's the best case scenario and unintentionally the best thing Trump has ever done.

[-] thlibos 4 points 3 days ago

I think the Xtian nationalists in Trump's circle want this destruction since they see it as a precursor to the rapture.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

I've heard this postulated since Bush Jr. but no. Christian fundamentalist are a useful voting bloc, they have influence on cultural issues that don't matter if you are trying to make money. (LBGT/Abortion etc) but war in Central America, Africa, South East Asia, all happen without them.

[-] thlibos 3 points 3 days ago

Not sure what you mean to say here.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
50 points (98.1% liked)

World News

3162 readers
102 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS