400
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reading this, I was reminded of how Nicolas Cage is part of the Coppola family but changed his name, I was told, so that he could “make it on his own.”

I looked that up and it turns out to be a complete lie. He actually changed his name to conceal the fact that he was not making it on his own.

EDIT to clarify if this was confusing: he was given roles by his uncle Francis Ford Coppola. This is nepotism aka “not making it on his own,” but with special help from family. To conceal the nepotism, his name was changed.

From Wikipedia:

At age 15, he tried to convince his uncle, Francis Ford Coppola, to give him a screen test, telling him "I'll show you acting." His outburst was met with "silence in the car."[20] By this stage of his career, Coppola had already directed Marlon BrandoAl PacinoGene Hackman and Robert De Niro. Although early in his career Cage appeared in some of his uncle's films, he changed his name to Nicolas Cage to avoid the appearance of nepotism as Coppola's nephew. His choice of name was inspired by the Marvel Comicssuperhero Luke Cage and composer John Cage.[21][22]

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

"To avoid the appearance of nepotism" sounds exactly like making it his own. You seem to have misunderstood. Are you an LLM?

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 months ago

The appearance of nepotism.

Nicholas Coppola got cast by his uncle, when any random 15 year old aspiring actor would never stand a chance.

He then changes his name so that other people in Hollywood will (hopefully) not say “oh he got that part because he’s Coppola’s nephew,” even if he absolutely got that job because he’s Coppola’s nephew.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

I'm not disputing that he got his first few roles due to his connections, but changing his name absolutely would have distanced him from his relatives in other directors' eyes.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

absolutely would have distanced him from his relatives in other directors' eyes.

Nah, everyone in the industry would know about this. But random people on the street wouldn't. And that's what it's about when you want to be famous.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No it wouldn't/didn't, but it would/did to the masses.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You have misunderstood. He was in fact the beneficiary of nepotism: staring in his uncle’s films. But to keep this a secret, he changed his name. He was hiding the nepotism, not trying to avoid nepotism.

Walk a little more softly. You came off as confidently wrong there.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

ive seen quite a few actors recently try to do this or trying to downplay thier nepotism.

load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
400 points (95.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21303 readers
1597 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS