▲ 657 ▼ Scientist warn 1 billion on track to die from climate change. (www.sciencealert.com) submitted 3 years ago by Stinkywinks@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 48 points 3 years ago (4 children) It's OK, they're just billion poorest people. /S permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 20 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is literally how rich people will take this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Muffi@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Until they realise that almost no production chains can continue without the hard work of the poorest at the beginning of the chain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Perhaps then, they'll finally get those robots we keep hearing about ;-) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago Nah, they will just convert middle class to poor. Robots are for writing, painting... permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) "Too many people at my beach anyways." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Too many, of the wrong people, at my beach. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 years ago (2 children) You joke, but that is how a lot of people feel about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) That is how conservatives feel about it. Normal people are unhappy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ox0r@jlai.lu 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Sadly conservative people have the money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago And therefore the power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 years ago Yeah. That's the sad part. I think most people sort of accidentally think that, without really critically thinking about it. The people who will suffer most area already invisible to most others. In NZ we're trying to reduce carbon emissions in farming to the cries of farmers "but you're killing our jobs" neglecting that they're indirectly killing actual people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Urbanfox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) In Europe over 60,000 people died in 2022 due to heatwaves. People are blind to these deaths because they're not being taken out by a single devastating event, but rather a series of small events the people brush off as "they were going to die anyway". It's one of the reasons I've not, and will not have children. This is getting exponentially worse and I couldn't image the horror that our future will face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) ... meanwhile we're compensating people who built $10m houses on cliff tops, who then cut down the trees securing the cliff edge, and are now finding out that cliffs erode, and their houses are failing into the sea. ... we're exempting farmers from paying the actual costs of their carbon emissions while they pollute or water ways with reckless abandon. It's only the poor fuckers down stream who'll get sick and die. ... While we still argue if old and sick people should die of COVID so that fashion shops can still hock their tat manufactured halfway around the world and shipped here on ships that burn the shittiest fuel available. I have had kids, and lament the world I'm giving to them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) At least with the house on the cliff example it's the insurance companies paying for it though right? Hopefully their premiums were priced appropriately and the insurer doesn't raise everyone else's rates to cover their folly. I've no doubt they would if that's the case, but I presume their actuaries did a decent job computing that risk so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm fairly sure, but have no evidence, that the argument is "the council approved these plans therefore it's the council's fault my house is falling off the cliff". Floating over the fact that the council approved a plan where there was 50m of vegetation securing the cliff edge... All of which has mysteriously disappeared over the last 15 years. Also apparently caveat emptor is only for poor people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That’s the irony. They are probably a lot of the people who contribute the least to climate change. So any misanthropes in here saying “good, this will help” are not only evil but wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 20 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is literally how rich people will take this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Muffi@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Until they realise that almost no production chains can continue without the hard work of the poorest at the beginning of the chain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Perhaps then, they'll finally get those robots we keep hearing about ;-) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago Nah, they will just convert middle class to poor. Robots are for writing, painting... permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) "Too many people at my beach anyways." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Too many, of the wrong people, at my beach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Muffi@programming.dev 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Until they realise that almost no production chains can continue without the hard work of the poorest at the beginning of the chain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Perhaps then, they'll finally get those robots we keep hearing about ;-) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago Nah, they will just convert middle class to poor. Robots are for writing, painting... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Perhaps then, they'll finally get those robots we keep hearing about ;-) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago Nah, they will just convert middle class to poor. Robots are for writing, painting... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago Nah, they will just convert middle class to poor. Robots are for writing, painting... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) "Too many people at my beach anyways." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Too many, of the wrong people, at my beach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Too many, of the wrong people, at my beach. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 years ago (2 children) You joke, but that is how a lot of people feel about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) That is how conservatives feel about it. Normal people are unhappy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ox0r@jlai.lu 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Sadly conservative people have the money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago And therefore the power. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 years ago Yeah. That's the sad part. I think most people sort of accidentally think that, without really critically thinking about it. The people who will suffer most area already invisible to most others. In NZ we're trying to reduce carbon emissions in farming to the cries of farmers "but you're killing our jobs" neglecting that they're indirectly killing actual people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) That is how conservatives feel about it. Normal people are unhappy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ox0r@jlai.lu 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Sadly conservative people have the money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago And therefore the power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ox0r@jlai.lu 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Sadly conservative people have the money permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago And therefore the power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 years ago And therefore the power. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 years ago Yeah. That's the sad part. I think most people sort of accidentally think that, without really critically thinking about it. The people who will suffer most area already invisible to most others. In NZ we're trying to reduce carbon emissions in farming to the cries of farmers "but you're killing our jobs" neglecting that they're indirectly killing actual people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Urbanfox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) In Europe over 60,000 people died in 2022 due to heatwaves. People are blind to these deaths because they're not being taken out by a single devastating event, but rather a series of small events the people brush off as "they were going to die anyway". It's one of the reasons I've not, and will not have children. This is getting exponentially worse and I couldn't image the horror that our future will face. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) ... meanwhile we're compensating people who built $10m houses on cliff tops, who then cut down the trees securing the cliff edge, and are now finding out that cliffs erode, and their houses are failing into the sea. ... we're exempting farmers from paying the actual costs of their carbon emissions while they pollute or water ways with reckless abandon. It's only the poor fuckers down stream who'll get sick and die. ... While we still argue if old and sick people should die of COVID so that fashion shops can still hock their tat manufactured halfway around the world and shipped here on ships that burn the shittiest fuel available. I have had kids, and lament the world I'm giving to them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) At least with the house on the cliff example it's the insurance companies paying for it though right? Hopefully their premiums were priced appropriately and the insurer doesn't raise everyone else's rates to cover their folly. I've no doubt they would if that's the case, but I presume their actuaries did a decent job computing that risk so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm fairly sure, but have no evidence, that the argument is "the council approved these plans therefore it's the council's fault my house is falling off the cliff". Floating over the fact that the council approved a plan where there was 50m of vegetation securing the cliff edge... All of which has mysteriously disappeared over the last 15 years. Also apparently caveat emptor is only for poor people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) ... meanwhile we're compensating people who built $10m houses on cliff tops, who then cut down the trees securing the cliff edge, and are now finding out that cliffs erode, and their houses are failing into the sea. ... we're exempting farmers from paying the actual costs of their carbon emissions while they pollute or water ways with reckless abandon. It's only the poor fuckers down stream who'll get sick and die. ... While we still argue if old and sick people should die of COVID so that fashion shops can still hock their tat manufactured halfway around the world and shipped here on ships that burn the shittiest fuel available. I have had kids, and lament the world I'm giving to them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) At least with the house on the cliff example it's the insurance companies paying for it though right? Hopefully their premiums were priced appropriately and the insurer doesn't raise everyone else's rates to cover their folly. I've no doubt they would if that's the case, but I presume their actuaries did a decent job computing that risk so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm fairly sure, but have no evidence, that the argument is "the council approved these plans therefore it's the council's fault my house is falling off the cliff". Floating over the fact that the council approved a plan where there was 50m of vegetation securing the cliff edge... All of which has mysteriously disappeared over the last 15 years. Also apparently caveat emptor is only for poor people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] solstice@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) At least with the house on the cliff example it's the insurance companies paying for it though right? Hopefully their premiums were priced appropriately and the insurer doesn't raise everyone else's rates to cover their folly. I've no doubt they would if that's the case, but I presume their actuaries did a decent job computing that risk so who knows. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm fairly sure, but have no evidence, that the argument is "the council approved these plans therefore it's the council's fault my house is falling off the cliff". Floating over the fact that the council approved a plan where there was 50m of vegetation securing the cliff edge... All of which has mysteriously disappeared over the last 15 years. Also apparently caveat emptor is only for poor people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I'm fairly sure, but have no evidence, that the argument is "the council approved these plans therefore it's the council's fault my house is falling off the cliff". Floating over the fact that the council approved a plan where there was 50m of vegetation securing the cliff edge... All of which has mysteriously disappeared over the last 15 years. Also apparently caveat emptor is only for poor people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) What council? Wouldn't their insurance be on the hook then? Eventually somewhere an insurer has written a policy for that $10m cliff side house. Per my previous point, hopefully their actuaries accurately priced the risk. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 3 years ago Sorry. I lapsed into some specifics of my locale. Didn't realise I was in world news. We have city councils. They are responsible for approving building plan/permits. They tend to be either unless pedantic or grossly negligent. There's been a trend here to blame that council for when a property becomes uninhabitable. E.g. by a cliff face eroding over time, accelerated by actions of the property owner. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That’s the irony. They are probably a lot of the people who contribute the least to climate change. So any misanthropes in here saying “good, this will help” are not only evil but wrong. permalink fedilink source parent