121

In Abilene, about 200 miles west of Dallas, Natura Resources is building the nation’s first advanced liquid-fuel research reactor in nearly 40 years. The project is housed at Abilene Christian University, where a $25 million research facility was completed in September 2023.

Natura has raised $120 million in private funding and received another $120 million from the Legislature.

Natura’s technology uses molten salt as both fuel and coolant — a design last tested at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960s. The company is first building a 1-megawatt research reactor in Abilene, intended to demonstrate to regulators and investors that the technology works and is safe.

...

Aalo Atomics is taking a different approach. The startup, founded by Canadian-born engineer Matt Loszak and based in Austin, is designing a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a technology that uses solid fuel, like conventional nuclear plants, built specifically for factory mass production.

Each unit would produce 10 megawatts, enough to power roughly 6,000 to 7,000 homes in Texas, and the reactors will be sized to fit on a standard truck. Aalo’s commercial model would consist of five of these units, totaling 50 megawatts.

Loszak said the company plans to activate its first 10 megawatt test reactor within about five months, after completing prototype testing at the end of December, as part of its effort to move toward commercial deployment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

Lol, typical American centric article.

Just outside Toronto, they're building four 300MW small modular reactors, at an existing nuclear plant, using proven designs from Hitachi, and the first one is targeted to come online by 2029 or 2030, eclipsing the Texas projects in scale, timeline, and practicality, but that literally doesn't even get a passing mention.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

4 years to build a power plant is still fucking stupid when you could install 10x the solar and battery capacity in that time.

[-] Nelots@piefed.zip 17 points 18 hours ago

The website is called The Texas Tribune. They write articles about Texas. I really don't know why you expected them to mention Canada.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The posted headline is literally "Texas become leading ground for testing small modular reactors".

That inherently implies that places that aren't Texas, are not becoming leading grounds for testing small modular reactors, bringing those other places into the discussion.

Right now that's not the headline I'm seeing on the article though, so either they're A/B testing headlines or OP editorialized.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

People in Texas aren’t known for their intellectual prowess. It’s like the Florida of the western half of the us.

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I meant divided in half

[-] Nelots@piefed.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

Fair enough point. And while it's not the article's headline, that is the tab's label when you open it.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

They are referring to the expert comments here about how SMRs can't be used for grid electricity, radiation leaks, etc.

They would rather breathe in that clean coal.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

300mw are indeed a much different scale from 10mw.

I wonder if your ire is misplaced... As these are sort of different things. The 10mw reactors have different use cases, they're not really designed to be installed as part of a power plant, but more for individual on-site uses, like as a reserve power system for a hospital, or as power for a remote mining location, disconnected from the grid.

My point is just, it might make sense to not mention the larger reactors here, as they're not really the same.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I’m sure Texas will do it in the dumbest most unregulated way possible. It will be a good example of what not to do.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Not winterize them, because the feds can't tell us what to do, and then have it melt down in the next polar inversion, of which they got one this year again. It's going to be a regular occurrence now with the global weirding.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Modern reactors don't really melt down like the first few generations did. And even so, it would still be less radioactive waste than coal power.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 13 hours ago

As if we can trust anything you say after that statistic you just proffered and responded with another outlandish claim when asked what methadology was used for you coal comparison.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 13 hours ago

You're more than welcome to type a few words into Google to see that I'm right.

But since you want to be spoon fed information, Here you go

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, these guys really have their heads up their asses on this.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

budgeted at 17.5c/watt (CAD), that too is a boondoggle before additional Ontario taxpayer corruption.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 day ago

So how long until it's small enough to power a Pip-boy?

[-] seederbot@lemmy.permisuan.com 3 points 19 hours ago

Asking the real questions

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

They're not in the same game.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
121 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS